Sunday, April 12, 2026

REFERENCE: Power Transformer Testing

Testing an Unknown Power Transformer

Every now and then I end up with a transformer on the bench that I know came from valve gear, but I did not take enough notes when I pulled it.  That was the case here.  I knew this one came out of an old Zenith radiogram, but that was about it, so the job was to work backwards and identify the windings properly.

Naturally, anything involving a power transformer deserves caution.  Unknown windings, mains voltage, and potentially lethal secondary voltages are not something to rush into.  It is worth stopping and thinking before connecting anything, or even attempting this.  

What I Knew Going In

In this case, I knew the donor unit ran on 240V and used a pair of cathode-biased 6V6, along with preamp and phase inverter valves, plus a valve rectifier.  

That gives a rough idea of the sort of transformer it is likely to be, but only in a broad sense - it does not confirm the actual heater voltage, HT voltage, or current capability, nor whether it actually works to begin with.


What a Typical Valve Amp Transformer Looks Like

A typical valve amp power transformer usually has a primary winding connected to the wall supply, one or more low-voltage secondary windings for heaters, and a higher-voltage secondary for the HT supply.  


Where I Start

First up is a visual inspection.  Before I go anywhere near it with power, I want to know whether there are any obvious signs of trouble - burnt areas, dodgy repairs, brittle or damaged insulation, loose leads, corrosion, or anything else that makes the transformer look questionable.  Basically, I am looking for any reason not to go any further.  Now is not the time for blind optimism.  

If it passes that first check, I start with the multimeter on continuity, just to sort the loose leads into groups that appear to belong together.  Often the original colour coding will help here too, if it is still clear enough to trust.


A low-resistance winding is often a heater winding, and a higher-resistance winding is often HT, but resistance on its own does not prove the voltage.  Winding resistance mainly reflects the wire size and the number of turns, and practical transformer behaviour also depends on inductance, losses and loading.

So I use resistance readings to sort and narrow things down, not as final identification.

Warning: It is also worth checking each winding to the transformer core, frame or bell ends.  Normally, I want to see open circuit there. 

Spotting a Likely Centre Tap

Where resistance readings are especially useful is in spotting a likely centre tap.

If one winding measures, say, about 74 ohms end to end, and about 38 ohms from each end to a third wire, that strongly suggests a centre-tapped winding.  Each half measures about half the total, which is exactly what you would expect.  A large resistance also suggests that it is not a heater wire.  



In the case of this transformer, the HT is the only winding with a centre tap.  The 6.3v heater does not have one, which is not uncommon on older transformers.  

The Better Test

Once the winding groups are sorted out, the next step is the one that really matters: apply a small known AC voltage to one winding and measure what appears on the others.

That is the proper way to identify an unknown transformer, because the measured voltage ratios directly reflect the turns ratios. 

It is also the point where you stop guessing and start mapping what the transformer actually does. If you put a known AC voltage on one winding and get a much higher voltage on another, you are clearly looking at a step-up relationship. If you get a much lower voltage, it is a step-down relationship.

This is the step that tells you which winding is the likely primary, which winding is the HT secondary, whether a winding is centre tapped, and what the heater winding voltages actually are.

That is a much firmer basis than ohms readings alone.

Bringing It Up on Mains (really, really carefully)

This is the point where things can get dangerous in a hurry.

Once I think I have identified the primary, I power it up and check the secondary voltages with no load connected. I use a Variac with a current meter, start with low voltage, and keep a close eye on the current draw. Some no-load current is normal, but I do not want to see anything excessive.

This is a completely hands-off test. The leads need to be properly secured on a clean bench before anything is powered up.  I want a clear view of the multimeter and the current meter, and I do not want to be moving probes or wires around while it is live.  

The Variac starts at zero and switched off.  Then I bring it up slowly, while watching, listening, and paying attention to how the transformer behaves.  Once I have the readings, the Variac goes back to zero and gets switched off.  Then I double-check that before touching anything.

At this point, I am not expecting the transformer to draw zero current  - some no-load current is normal. 

What I want to see is sensible voltages and sensible behaviour. 

If the transformer stays reasonably quiet and cool, and the secondary voltages look believable, that is a good sign. 

If it draws obviously too much current, gets hot quickly, or starts buzzing and complaining, I would stop immediately and reconsider all previous steps and the safety of the transformer. 

What the No-Load Voltages Tell You

The unloaded voltages are important because they confirm the winding functions far more reliably than resistance ever can.

A low-voltage winding that sits around the expected few volts AC is very likely a heater winding. 

A winding that gives you two equal voltages from each end to a centre lead is very likely a centre-tapped HT winding. 

Once that is established, you can start thinking sensibly about whether the transformer is suitable for the sort of amp you have in mind.

There is also a practical reason for checking the transformer unloaded before going any further.  Transformer behaviour changes under load. Whitlock points out that when a load is connected, the secondary current opposes the excitation flux and the primary draws additional current accordingly.  So if all you want at this stage is identification, unloaded testing keeps the picture simpler.

A Couple of Easy Mistakes

One easy mistake is to overstate what a resistance reading tells you.  It can suggest a heater winding or suggest a centre tap, but it does not confirm the operating voltage.

And one more: if the transformer came from old or unknown equipment, do not assume the original primary was intended for today’s wall voltage, or is in fact even vaguely suited to your wall voltage.

Bottom Line

For me, the sensible order is:
  1. visual check
  2. continuity,
  3. resistance,
  4. small AC voltage test to confirm,
  5. then a careful mains bring-up and unloaded voltage check.

That way you use each test for what it is actually good at.  Continuity tells you what belongs together. Resistance helps sort likely windings and likely centre taps. AC voltage testing tells you what the windings really are. Then a careful live test confirms whether the transformer behaves sensibly at its intended input.

Resistance gets you close. Voltage confirms it.


Monday, April 6, 2026

AWA: Model PA872, 20w Valve PA Amplifier (Serial Number 94)

I posted another AWA PA872 a while back, but realised I never actually shared this one.  It had been sitting on the shelf for months - one of those projects that was nearly there, but never quite finished.  I finally got around to wrapping it up this weekend.

This looks to be an earlier unit, although schematically the same.  The serial number is much lower (#94), and the general aesthetic appears earlier.

Someone had already had a go at converting it—let’s just say what I found inside is a good reminder to be cautious with amps of unknown history.  I never even turned it on - deathtrap.

This one came to me as a friendly trade. The previous owner hadn’t worked on it themselves, and was unaware of the condition—they were just clearing out a few projects they knew they were never going to get around to.

With no real baseline to work from, I stripped it right back to the sockets and started again.  It’s now rebuilt as a 5E3-style Deluxe, with a few tweaks to taste.

The stock 5E3 uses 100n coupling caps on the preamp.  I dropped the bright channel right down to 22n, and trimmed the normal channel slightly to 82n.  For the tone control, I’ve gone with stock 5n on the bass side and increased treble from 500pf to 1n, for a slightly different response.  The results are good - two distinctly different, but useful channels.

I chased a pretty stubborn hum for a while - in the end, it came down to grounding.  Moving the power transformer ground to the same point as the filter caps fixed it immediately.  We're only talking a distance of about 80mm.

There was a previous attempt to “fix” the hum, which involved adding 2 x 220uf filter caps to the power supply—so it’s no surprise the valve rectifier was dead on arrival.  Yes - 220uf, not 22...  

AWA MODEL PA 872 - 20 WATT PA AMPLIFIER

I really like the blue hammered finish, and someone in the design team really nailed the look.  

AWA MODEL PA 872 - 20 WATT PA AMPLIFIER

Schematic screened onto the back of the amp - a nice touch for serviceability.  Serial number 94.

AWA MODEL PA 872 - 20 WATT PA AMPLIFIER - REAR PANEL

The amp can run a 15 ohm speaker without any dodgy rewiring of the output transformer, so that's always handy.


I patched over some holes for a couple of can capacitors, as they were dead, and not conveniently placed for what I wanted to achieve.

Not my most amazing work to date, but it is solid, and it sounds great.



FURTHER READING


My previous post for the 872, which has full tech details 




Monday, March 23, 2026

FORTIN: Fuzz

Request - here you go & I hope this is what you were after.  Could shave off a column or two if that's a bother.

The Fortin is a pretty stock silicon fuzz face with an input blend, a 10k trimmer in place of the usual 8k2 resistor and a 100n cap on the output.  A few smallish caps on the collector and base of transistors to tame the fizz.   It's not unlike the D*A*M Drag n Fly DF-05 and no doubt a few other fuzz faces with an input blend.

Schematic can be found here

FORTIN FUZZ






Saturday, March 21, 2026

CUNNINGHAM AMPS: Zonk / MKI

I came across a series of photos of this build on the PedalPCB forum, and there seemed to be a bit of confusion around the schematic.  Thought it was worth documenting some of the observed values here for reference.

The board shown below is from the wedge enclosure.  There’s also a more pedalboard friendly version, which includes an internal tone control.  It looks to be implemented with a trimmer and a capacitor in series at the output of the circuit — not unlike the approach used in a Marshall Supafuzz MKI.  I tried a 4n7 in series with a A1M pot on the breadboard - worked just fine.  There also appears to be a resistor and a small value capacitor in parallel to ground on the input of the circuit - kind of hard to see that bit, but it looks like 2M and 1300pf.

A few of the capacitor values are non-standard, and there are some variations in the resistor values as well — clearly some biasing tweaks and tuning by ear going on here.

The Zonk / MKI switch is a nice touch.  It adds a 2n7 capacitor in series with a 10n capacitor at the input. It’s a clever implementation too - mounting the 2n7 directly on the switch reduces the number of connections back to the board and keeps everything neat and tidy.

They're all impeccably built - amazing work.

CUNNINGHAM AMPS ZONK / MKI




As always with these circuits, while the passive component values are easy enough to document, the real story is in the transistors - their gain, leakage, and how they interact in-circuit. That’s the part you can’t see on a schematic, and it’s what makes or breaks a MKI style circuit.

Q1: TI 2N1307
Q2: OC45 
Q3: TI 2G308

Thursday, March 19, 2026

BE: MKI Tone Bender - Shorty

Yes, it's another MKI.   I designed this layout based on a Zonk to fit a specific enclosure width.  So nothing remarkable, just one for me to use later.

MKI TONE BENDER - SHORTY

It's missing the 33k resistor that normally sits across the 50k pot, cause I like to use an A25k instead.   I sometimes make a few other taste related changes, depending on the transistors, etc. 



 








Wednesday, March 18, 2026

RUSH: Pep Box

One that I've probably overlooked a little, given its place in the early history of English fuzz pedals - which was likely inspired by the Maestro...  

There was a three-transistor version prior to this called "Fuzzy" which by all accounts is a Maestro.   The later versions dropped the input buffer and made the jump from 3 to 9 volts.

These are gated nasty wonders of the fuzz world.


RUSH PEP BOX - GE VERSION

RUSH PEP BOX - GE VERSION vero layout

The 56k resistor is sitting across the 500k volume pot, so you could just drop the pot down to 50k and lose the extra part.  

RUSH PEP BOX - SI VERSION

Later versions transitioned to silicon devices and became more widely recognised in their large red WEM enclosures.  Rush had originally manufactured these units for WEM, before the company reportedly parted ways with him while continuing to use his circuit design.  


Further reading: